Thursday, November 02, 2006

Eclipse

All that you touch
All that you see
All that you taste
All that you feel
All that you love
All that you hate
All you distrust
All that you save
All that you give
All that you deal
All that you buy
beg, borrow, or steal
All you create
All you destroy
All that you do
All that you say
All that you eat
everyone you meet
All that you slight
everyone you fight
All that is now
All that is gone
All that's to come
and everything under the sun is in tune
but the sun is eclipsed by the moon.

- Eclipse by Pink Floyd
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LzBc04PA24g

************************************************************

If we all turn out to vote Nov. 7, we can raise the minimum wage.

************************************************************

How nice to be ABOVE the law! Too bad you and I and the rest of the country aren’t.

http://www.boston.com/news/nation/articles/
2006/04/30/bush-challenges-hundreds-of-laws/

Water Boarding

Sounds like a fun day at the beach: surf’s up! Or the newest release from The Beach Boys or a Frankie Avalon movie. WELL, IT ISN’T! Water boarding is something this country, our country, practices. It is a special kind of TORTURE. Torture that places the head of the enemy under water until he gurgles, turns blue, and thinks he is drowning. It is only then that he is released by his captors, us. Once released, valuable information is expected to begin spewing from his mouth. No, I’m not making this up; I wish I were.

According to experienced members of our own armed services, many of whom are not tenderhearted liberals, torture doesn’t even work as a technique for gaining intelligence. Prisoners under torture will admit to anything, including crimes they never committed, to get the torture to stop. These veterans say that nine out of ten prisoners can be persuaded to talk with no "stress methods" at all, let alone cruel and unusual ones (see http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/
articles/A2302-2005Jan11.html). I wonder why, then, our government insists on using torture. Perhaps because it can …?

Do you remember Paul Volcker? He was on Charlie Rose last week and spoke of the very concerns plaguing many of us. To start, there was Cheney’s cryptic advice as we learned that our country had just invaded Iraq. “Go shopping,” he said. Go shopping? Our country had just invaded a sovereign country, preemptively for the first time in recorded history, and we were being told to go shopping? Volcker then spoke of the unprecedented trade deficit this country is amassing. The whole Washington scene concerns him. He hasn’t seen so much bad policy in his lifetime. Volcker is pessimistic about either political party having the determination to stop the hemorrhage. He spoke as a concerned citizen, making the interview all the more compelling. Lastly, Volcker asked, where are we going? This interview can be purchased from PBS for those who share his concerns

Some of the Most Egregious Acts against the United States by the Bush Administration

*Removal of U.S. from Kyoto Accords
*Bank record spying
*Illegal domestic spying
*Phone record spying
*Hurricane Katrina
*Criminal offense of exposing Valerie Plame
*Abuse scandal at Iraq's Abu Ghraib prison
*Creation of global detention centers
*Rendition
*Interrogation techniques at Guantanamo Bay
*Lying to Congress regarding pre-emptive war in Iraq
*Destruction of evidence from ground zero of the World Trade Center
*Cover up of the 9/11/2001 WTC investigation
*Plundering the treasury
*Attempt to raid the Social Security Fund

*Impeachment appears six times in the U.S. Constitution. The Founders weren't concerned with anything more than with impeachment because they had lived under King George III and had in 1776 accused the king of all the things that, according to Ramsey Clark’s 2003 Articles of Impeachment, George W. Bush does: usurp the power of the people; behave as if he is above the law; criminally abuse authority (see http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=The_case_for_impeachment_
of_President_George_W._Bush#Ramsey_Clark.27s_Articles_of_Impeachment).

"I earned capital in the campaign, political capital, and now I intend to spend it. It is my style. That's what happened in the--after the 2000 election, I earned some capital. I've earned capital in this election--and I'm going to spend it for what I told the people I'd spend it on."--George W. Bush, November 4, 2004.

The U.S. Embassy in Iraq: an Update

You haven’t forgotten the super-duper U.S. Embassy being built in Iraq’s
Green Zone, have you? Well heck, let me bring you up-to-date with an article from AlterNet.

Asian Workers Trafficked to Build U.S. Embassy in Baghdad
By David Phinney, CorpWatch
Posted October 26, 2006

The State Department quietly awarded a corrupt Kuwaiti company a $592-million contract to build the U.S. embassy in Iraq.

Things began looking even sketchier than ever to John Owen as he boarded a nondescript white jet on his way back to Iraq in March 2005 following some R&R in Kuwait City.

Employed by First Kuwaiti Trading & Contracting, the lead builder for the new $592-million US embassy in Baghdad, Owen remembers being surrounded at the airport by about 50 company laborers freshly hired from the Philippines and India. Everyone was holding boarding passes to Dubai--not to Baghdad.

"I thought there was some sort of mix up and I was getting on the wrong plane," says the 48-year-old Floridian who was working as a general construction foreman on the embassy project.

Seven months after signing on with First Kuwaiti in November 2005, he quit.

In his resignation letter last June, Owen told First Kuwaiti and US State Department officials that his managers physically assaulted and beat the construction workers, demonstrated little regard for worker safety, and routinely breached security.

And it was all happening smack in the middle of the US-controlled Green Zone--right under the nose of the State Department that had quietly awarded the controversial embassy contract in July 2005.

He also complained of poor sanitation, squalid living conditions and medical malpractice in the labor camps where several thousand low-paid migrant workers lived. Those workers, recruited on the global labor market from the Philippines, India, Pakistan, and other poor south Asian countries, earned as little as $10 to $30 a day. As with many US-funded contractors, First Kuwaiti prefers importing labor because it views Iraqi workers as a security headache not worth the trouble.

Despite numerous emails and phone calls about such allegations, neither First Kuwaiti general manager, Wadih Al Absi, nor his lawyer, Angela Styles, the former top White House contract policy advisor, has responded. After a year of requests, State Department officials involved with the project also have ignored or rejected opportunities for comment.

Now there’s a tidy end to a pesky problem, eh? You can read the rest of this article on AlterNet; it is giving me a headache. But let me ask at this juncture: is this where the American worker’s future is headed?

Here are some sobering thoughts from TV News Lies. They speak of things so terrible we haven’t the nerve to say them out loud. Thoughts many of us have entertained in the privacy and safety of our very own minds. Go to TV News Lies and decide for yourself. For me, there will be the stupid expression on Bush’s face that will haunt me for the rest of my life.

If a group of people made a public statement saying that having a new Pearl Harbor would be the only way the public would support their agenda, and these same people were in positions that would allow them to conduct, permit, or enable such an event when that event actually took place...would they deserve your suspicion? Well this is EXACTLY what happened. The very people with established motives for conducting an event like the one that took place on 9/11/2001 were responsible for national security when we had that most unlikely, unrealistic, and implausible event: the complete catastrophic failure of every single defense procedure in operation. Yet Americans look to these people for protection now.

The US military was running as many as 15 defense drills that day. Some of these drills were live-fly hijacking simulations. Some of the drills were practicing for the possibility of having planes fly into government buildings. Could it be that someone decided that these drills would go live? Why have the corporate news media refused to report the drills to the public? Could it be because you would start asking REAL questions about that day? Well, it is time for you to start asking questions because you may just be supporting the real terrorists!

This seems to be the issue of my blog where I sound off about all the things that have bothered me with this administration. No, it isn’t an issue of one party or the other controlling the presidency. It is more an issue of one party controlling every aspect of our government. I must share some of the astonishment that overcame my very being as I watched the Republican convention of 2004. I couldn’t shake the feeling that it looked and sounded like a Hitler rally as seen on the History channel. Don’t be silly, I told myself. Then there was the image of the new administration charging into the White House, briefcases in hand. A chill ran down my spine as apprehension racked my physical being. Oh, your imagination is running wild, I told myself. Then came the full frontal attack on Social Security. Massive public outcry was the only thing able to stop that sinister plan in its tracks. But you can bet your denture cream that the administration is still licking its chops for a chance to get its mitts on that money.

Election 2004

NO PAPER TRAIL LEFT BEHIND. No, folks, that was no accident. It was a well-orchestrated effort to take control of this country. The religious right, which Rove and Bush have repeatedly referred to as loonies, was simply used as a tool. It didn’t know what hit it any more than John Kerry knew what hit him.

Hanging chads, baby, hanging chads. The Supreme Court appointed the president ... unfortunately, it was Bush.

Here’s the word on the stolen election from TV News Lies:

Editor’s Comments - http://tvnewslies.org/blog
TVNL Editor's Comments: US Corporate Media --

America’s Greatest Enemy: Nobody Needs to Know About Election Fraud!

Keep in mind that the press is the only vocation that is protected by the U.S. Constitution. The reason for this is because it is the press that is tasked with keeping our democracy alive and healthy. They are responsible for keeping the public informed about the conduct of the people who hold Constitutional offices and all things related. They are responsible for alerting the public when threats to our democracy or Constitution arise.

Well we now have evidence that last three elections, one presidential and two midterms, have been subject to massive election fraud that has resulted in reversing the results of American elections; including presidential elections. That’s right, folks; George W. Bush was not elected, twice. His cabal, which includes the owners of the two companies that manufacture the majority of the electronic voting machines, stole two presidential elections in the United States of America. This has been fully documented.

Now, as each day passes, new stories exposing what appears to be the largest effort in the history of human kind to manipulate election results go unmentioned on TV and radio news reports. You have to wait for an occasional one time special or report here and there to learn about the rising “concern” about our electoral system but you do not hear the daily reports of actual election crimes taking place now!

When our Constitutional institutions are threatened it is the single most important responsibility of journalists to inform the public of this. Technically nothing else should matter to the press. You can liken this to making sure you have food and water before you do anything else. The press is there to make sure that our democracy has food and water. It is the job of the press to tell the people of this nation when their democracy is in jeopardy. Our current national press is complicit in the crime of starving our democracy to death. They continue to trick the American public into becoming concerned about so-called news items that have no impact on the nation; only on a few people here and there while they deliberately refuse to expose the criminals who are tampering with our democracy.

Here it is: the entire list of George W. Bush’s crimes against humanity
(SourceWatch is better)
http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=The-case-for-
impeachment-of-President-George-W.-Bush
http://www.motherearth.org/bushwanted/laws.php

The Federalist Papers

The Federalist Papers were written and published during the years 1787 and 1788 in several New York State newspapers to persuade New York voters to ratify the proposed constitution. They consist of 85 essays outlining how this new government would operate and why this type of government was the best choice for the United States of America. The essays were signed PUBLIUS. The authors of some papers are under dispute, but the general consensus is that Alexander Hamilton wrote 52, James Madison wrote 28, and John Jay contributed the remaining five. The Federalist Papers remain today as an excellent reference for anyone who wants to understand the U.S. Constitution.

This one continues with concern of dangers from foreign force and influence. The author once again is John Jay.

To the People of the State of New York:

QUEEN ANNE, in her letter of the 1st July, 1706, to the Scotch Parliament, makes some observations on the importance of the UNION then forming between England and Scotland, which merit our attention. I shall present the public with one or two extracts from it: "An entire and perfect union will be the solid foundation of lasting peace: It will secure your religion, liberty, and property; remove the animosities amongst yourselves, and the jealousies and differences betwixt our two kingdoms. It must increase your strength, riches, and trade; and by this union the whole island, being joined in affection and free from all apprehensions of different interest, will be ENABLED TO RESIST ALL ITS ENEMIES." "We most earnestly recommend to you calmness and unanimity in this great and weighty affair, that the union may be brought to a happy conclusion, being the only EFFECTUAL way to secure our present and future happiness, and disappoint the designs of our and your enemies, who will doubtless, on this occasion, USE THEIR UTMOST ENDEAVORS TO PREVENT OR DELAY THIS UNION."

It was remarked in the preceding paper, that weakness and divisions at home would invite dangers from abroad; and that nothing would tend more to secure us from them than union, strength, and good government within ourselves. This subject is copious and cannot easily be exhausted.

The history of Great Britain is the one with which we are in general the best acquainted, and it gives us many useful lessons. We may profit by their experience without paying the price which it cost them. Although it seems obvious to common sense that the people of such an island should be but one nation, yet we find that they were for ages divided into three, and that those three were almost constantly embroiled in quarrels and wars with one another. Notwithstanding their true interest with respect to the continental nations was really the same, yet by the arts and policy and practices of those nations, their mutual jealousies were perpetually kept inflamed, and for a long series of years they were far more inconvenient and troublesome than they were useful and assisting to each other.

Should the people of America divide themselves into three or four nations, would not the same thing happen? Would not similar jealousies arise, and be in like manner cherished? Instead of their being "joined in affection" and free from all apprehension of different "interests," envy and jealousy would soon extinguish confidence and affection, and the partial interests of each confederacy, instead of the general interests of all America, would be the only objects of their policy and pursuits. Hence, like most other BORDERING nations, they would always be either involved in disputes and war, or live in the constant apprehension of them.

The most sanguine advocates for three or four confederacies cannot reasonably suppose that they would long remain exactly on an equal footing in point of strength, even if it was possible to form them so at first; but, admitting that to be practicable, yet what human contrivance can secure the continuance of such equality? Independent of those local circumstances which tend to beget and increase power in one part and to impede its progress in another, we must advert to the effects of that superior policy and good management which would probably distinguish the government of one above the rest, and by which their relative equality in strength and consideration would be destroyed. For it cannot be presumed that the same degree of sound policy, prudence, and foresight would uniformly be observed by each of these confederacies for a long succession of years.

Whenever, and from whatever causes, it might happen, and happen it would, that any one of these nations or confederacies should rise on the scale of political importance much above the degree of her neighbors, that moment would those neighbors behold her with envy and with fear. Both those passions would lead them to countenance, if not to promote, whatever might promise to diminish her importance; and would also restrain them from measures calculated to advance or even to secure her prosperity. Much time would not be necessary to enable her to discern these unfriendly dispositions. She would soon begin, not only to lose confidence in her neighbors, but also to feel a disposition equally unfavorable to them. Distrust naturally creates distrust, and by nothing is good-will and kind conduct more speedily changed than by invidious jealousies and uncandid imputations, whether expressed or implied.

The North is generally the region of strength, and many local circumstances render it probable that the most Northern of the proposed confederacies would, at a period not very distant, be unquestionably more formidable than any of the others. No sooner would this become evident than the NORTHERN HIVE would excite the same ideas and sensations in the more southern parts of America which it formerly did in the southern parts of Europe. Nor does it appear to be a rash conjecture that its young swarms might often be tempted to gather honey in the more blooming fields and milder air of their luxurious and more delicate neighbors.

They who well consider the history of similar divisions and confederacies will find abundant reason to apprehend that those in contemplation would in no other sense be neighbors than as they would be borderers; that they would neither love nor trust one another, but on the contrary would be a prey to discord, jealousy, and mutual injuries; in short, that they would place us exactly in the situations in which some nations doubtless wish to see us, viz., FORMIDABLE ONLY TO EACH OTHER.

From these considerations it appears that those gentlemen are greatly mistaken who suppose that alliances offensive and defensive might be formed between these confederacies, and would produce that combination and union of wills of arms and of resources, which would be necessary to put and keep them in a formidable state of defense against foreign enemies.

When did the independent states, into which Britain and Spain were formerly divided, combine in such alliance, or unite their forces against a foreign enemy? The proposed confederacies will be DISTINCT NATIONS. Each of them would have its commerce with foreigners to regulate by distinct treaties; and as their productions and commodities are different and proper for different markets, so would those treaties be essentially different. Different commercial concerns must create different interests, and of course different degrees of political attachment to and connection with different foreign nations. Hence it might and probably would happen that the foreign nation with whom the SOUTHERN confederacy might be at war would be the one with whom the NORTHERN confederacy would be the most desirous of preserving peace and friendship. An alliance so contrary to their immediate interest would not therefore be easy to form, nor, if formed, would it be observed and fulfilled with perfect good faith.

Nay, it is far more probable that in America, as in Europe, neighboring nations, acting under the impulse of opposite interests and unfriendly passions, would frequently be found taking different sides. Considering our distance from Europe, it would be more natural for these confederacies to apprehend danger from one another than from distant nations, and therefore that each of them should be more desirous to guard against the others by the aid of foreign alliances, than to guard against foreign dangers by alliances between themselves. And here let us not forget how much more easy it is to receive foreign fleets into our ports, and foreign armies into our country, than it is to persuade or compel them to depart. How many conquests did the Romans and others make in the characters of allies, and what innovations did they under the same character introduce into the governments of those whom they pretended to protect.

Let candid men judge, then, whether the division of America into any given number of independent sovereignties would tend to secure us against the hostilities and improper interference of foreign nations.

PUBLIUS.

Where Are You Going, Where Have You Been?

Although reminiscent now, the mood of Joyce Carol Oates’s short story seems appropriate today. The story tells of the adventures of a teenage girl, its title a perfectly timed metaphor as we forge ahead into an uncertain future. Joyce Carol Oates (b. 1938) dedicated this work to Bob Dylan. It allows the reader a glimpse into the thoughts of a young writer of her time. Below is the second of four installments.

(For continuity, the last sentence of the last paragraph is: ”You wanta come for a ride!” he said.)

Connie smirked and let her hair fall loose over one shoulder.

“Don’tcha like my car? New paint job,” he said. “Hey--”

“What?”

“You’re cute.”

She pretended to fidget, chasing flies away from the door.

“Don’tcha believe me, or what?” he said.

“Look, I don’t even know who you are,” Connie said in disgust.

“Hey, Ellie’s got a radio, see. Mine’s broke down.” He lifted his friend’s arm and showed her the little transistor the boy was holding, and now Connie began to hear the music. It was the same program that was playing inside the house.

“Bobby King?” she said.

“I listen to him all the time. I think he’s great.”

“He’s kind of great,” Connie said reluctantly.

“Listen, that guy’s great. He knows where the action is.”

Connie blushed a little, because the glasses made it impossible for her to see just what this boy was looking at. She couldn’t decide if she liked him or if he was just a jerk, and so she dawdled in the doorway and wouldn’t come down or go back inside. She said, “What’s all that stuff painted on your car?”

“Can’tcha read it?” He opened the door very carefully, as if he was afraid it might fall off. He slid out just as carefully. planting his feet firmly on the ground, the tiny metallic world in his glasses slowing down like gelatine hardening and in the midst of it Connie’s bright green blouse.

“This here is my name to begin with,” he said.

ARNOLD FRIEND was written in tarlike black letters on the side, with a drawing of a round grinning face that reminded Connie of a pumpkin, except it wore sunglasses. “I wanta introduce myself, I’m Arnold Friend and that’s my real name and I’m gonna be your friend, honey, and inside the car’s Ellie Oscar, he’s kinda shy.” Ellie brought his transistor radio up to his shoulder and balanced it there. “Now these numbers are a secret code, honey,” Arnold Friend explained. He read off the numbers 33, 19, 17, and raised his eyebrows at her to see what she thought of that, but she didn’t think much of it. The left rear fender had been smashed and around it was written, on the gleaning gold background: DONE BY CRAZY WOMAN DRIVER. Connie had to laugh at that. Arnold Friend was pleased at her laugher and looked up at her. “Around the other side’s a lot more--you wanta come and see them?”

“No.”

“Why not?”

“Why should I?”

“Don’tcha wanta see what’s on the car? Don’tcha wanta go for a ride?”

“I don’t know.”

“Why not?”

“I got things to do.”

“Like what?”

“Things.”

He laughed as if she had said something funny. He slapped his thighs. He was standing in a strange way, leaning back against the car as if he were balancing himself. He wasn’t tall, only an inch or so taller than she would be if she came down to him. Connie liked the way he was dressed, which was the way all of them dressed: tight faded jeans stuffed into black, scuffed boots, a belt that pulled his waist in and showed how lean he was, and a white pullover shirt that was a little soiled and showed the hard small muscles of his arms and shoulders. He looked as if he probably did hard work, lifting and carrying things. Even his neck looked muscular. And his face was a familiar face, somehow: the jaw and chin and cheeks slightly darkened, because he hadn’t shaved for a day or two, and the nose long and hawklike, sniffing as if she were a treat he was going to gobble up and it was all a joke.

“Connie, you ain’t telling the truth. This is your day set aside for a ride with me and you know it,” he said, still laughing. The way he straightened and recovered from his fit of laughing showed that it had all been fake.

“How do you know what my name is?” she said suspiciously.

“It’s Connie.”

“Maybe and maybe not.”

“I know my Connie,” he said, wagging his finger. Now she remembered him even better, back at the restaurant, and her cheeks warmed at the thought of how she sucked in her breath just at the moment she passed him--how she must have looked at him. And he had remembered her. “Ellie and I come out here especially for you,” he said. “Ellie can sit in the back. How about it?”

“Where?”

“Where what?”

“Where’re we going?”

He looked at her. He took off the sunglasses and she saw how pale the skin around his eyes was, like holes that were not in shadow but instead in light. His eyes were like chips of broken glass that catch the light in an amiable way. He smiled. It was as if the idea of going for a ride somewhere, to some place, was a new idea to him.

“Just for a ride, Connie sweetheart.”

“I never said my name was Connie,” she said.

“But I know what it is. I know your name and all about you, lots of things,” Arnold Friend said. He had not moved yet but stood still leading back against the side of his jalopy. “I took a special interest in you, such a pretty girl, and found out all about you, like I know your parents and sister are gone somewheres, and I know where and how long they’re going to be gone, and I know who you were with last night, and your best girlfriend’s name is Betty. Right?”

He spoke in a simple lilting voice, exactly as if he were reciting the words to a song. His smile assured her that everything was fine. In the car, Ellie turned up the volume on his radio and did not bother to look around at them.

“Ellie can sit in the back seat,” Arnold Friend said. He indicated his friend with a casual jerk of his chin, as if Ellie did not count and she should not bother with him.

“How’d you find out all that stuff?” Connie said.

“Listen: Betty Schultz and Tony Fitch and Jimmy Pettinger and Nancy Pettinger,” he said, in a chant. “Raymond Stanley and Bob Hutter--”

“Do you know all those kids?”

“I know everybody.”

“Look, you’re kidding. You’re not from around here.”

“Sure.”

“But--how come we never saw you before?”

“Sure you saw me before,” he said. He looked down at his boots as if he were a little offended. “You just don’t remember.”

“I guess I’d remember you,” Connie said.

“Yeah?” He looked up at this beaming. He was pleased. He began to mark time with the music from Ellie’s radio, tapping his fists lightly together. Connie looked away from his smile to the car, which was painted so bright it almost hurt her eyes to look at it. She looked at the name, ARNOLD FRIEND. And up at the front fender was an expression that was familiar--MAN THE FLYING SAUCERS. It was an expression kids had used the year before, but didn’t use this year. She looked at it for a while as if the words meant something to her that she did not yet know.

“What’re you thinking about? Huh?” Arnold Friend demanded. “Not worried about your hair blowing around in the car, are you?”

“No.”

“Think I maybe can’t drive good?”

“How do I know?”

“You’re a hard girl to handle. How come?” he said. “Don’t you know I’m your friend? Didn’t you see me put my sign in the air when you walked by?”

“What sign?”

“My sign.” And he drew an X in the air, leaning out toward her. They were maybe ten feet apart. After his hand fell back to his side X was still in the air, almost visible. Connie let the screen door close and stood perfectly still inside it, listening to the music from her radio and the boy’s blend together. She stared at Arnold Friend. He stood there so stiffly relaxed, pretending to be relaxed, with one hand idly on the door handle as if he were keeping himself up that way and had no intention of ever moving again. She recognized most things about him, the tight jeans that showed his thighs and buttocks and the greasy leather boots and the tight shirt, and even that slippery friendly smile of his, that sleepy dreamy smile that all the boys used to get across ideas they didn’t want to put into words. She recognized all this and also the singsong way he talked, slightly mocking, kidding, but serious and a little melancholy, and she recognized the way he tapped one fist against the other in homage of the perpetual music behind him. But all these things did not come together.

She said suddenly, “Hey, how old are you?”

His smile faded. She could see then that he wasn’t a kid, he was much older--thirty, maybe more. At this knowledge her heart began to pound faster.

“That’s a crazy thing to ask. Can’tcha see I’m your own age?”

“Like hell you are.”

“Or maybe a coupla years older, I’m eighteen.”

“Eighteen?” she said doubtfully.

He grinned to reassure her and lines appeared at the corners of his mouth. His teeth were big and white. He grinned so broadly his eyes became slits and she saw how thick the lashes were, thick and black as if painted with a black tarlike material. Then he seemed to become embarrassed, abruptly, and looked over his shoulder at Ellie. “Him, he’s crazy.” he said. “Ain’t he a riot, he’s a nut, a real character.” Ellie was still listening to the music. His sunglasses told nothing about what he was thinking. He wore a bright orange shirt unbuttoned halfway to show his chest, which was a pale, bluish chest and not muscular like Arnold Friend’s. His shirt collar was turned up all around and the very tips of the collar pointed out past his chin as if they were protecting him. He was pressing the transistor radio up against his ear and sat there in a kind of daze, right in the sun.

“He’s kinda strange,” Connie said.

“Hey, she says you’re kinda strange! Kinda strange!” Arnold Friend cried. He pounded on the car to get Ellie’s attention. Ellie turned for the first time and Connie saw with shock that he wasn’t a kid either--he had a fair, hairless face, cheeks reddened slightly as if the veins grew too close to the surface of the skin, the face of a forty-year-old baby. Connie felt a wave of dizziness rise in her at this sight and she stared at him as if waiting for something to change the shock of the moment, make it all right again. Ellie’s lips kept shaping words, mumbling along with the words blasting in his ear.

Stay tuned for part three of four parts in the next blog post.