Friday, March 21, 2014

Remember the bad old days?
Here's a review, lest we forget.

Check out our links to outstanding sources for news that’s conspicuously absent from America's commercial, corporate media.

There are too many superb sites to list!

Don’t miss "Democracy Now!"

It's the best way for Real Americans (affectionately known as Unamericans) to defend themselves against Bush's pathologically compulsive bait-and-switch, rob the poor to pay the rich, closed-door politics of extreme hubris.

Happy reading; keep the faith; and keep fighting--this is our country, and it is up to each of us to save it...and to rescue the embattled majority of average working class folks from the tyranny of the privileged minority of super-rich elitists.
The Scallion

Disclaimer: this online political & social satire webzine is not suitable for the decerebrate (translation: our illustrious bonehead, his benighted administration, neo-ultraconservative Republicans, rabid Catholics, sheep, or their sympathizers) or for readers under age 18. As satirists, we take no responsibility if what we say is dangerously close to the truth. If you're under 18, stop reading this NOW & go turn yourself in to your Mommy for a well-deserved spanking, you no-good little whelp.

******
February 12, 2006--So much outrage...so little time!

Since we of The Scallion are still officially on hiatus, we are saving ourselves a bunch of time and effort by combining a sampling of our recent political letters into a single post...and we hope our faithful Readers will bear with us.

We hope to be back soon writing the satire that so naturally falls from the ridiculous and absurd we see around us every day.

Happy reading...and remember: this is OUR country, and it is up to us to hold our government accountable!

******
“What affects anyone anywhere affects everyone everywhere.”
                                                       – Dennis Kucinich

“The deluded are always filled with absolutes.
The rest of us have to live with ambiguity.”
–spoken by Clancy in “Aristoi,”
  written by Walter Jon Williams.

“It is the responsibility of every thinking person not to side with his or her executioner.”

  – Albert Camus.

“Popular democracy anywhere threatens fascism everywhere.”
– The Scallion.

******
From the "News We Just Might See" Department ...

So ... pharmacists can deny women access to their prescription birth control medications on the grounds of said pharmacists' "moral" beliefs?

Then here is a headline that can't be far away:

Vegan pharmacist refuses to fill prescriptions for Armour thyroid (which is produced from dessicated pig thyroid glands) on the grounds of God’s will and his religion;

Same animal rights activist pharmacist also refuses to fill prescriptions for medications compounded with milk products and vaccines compounded with horse serum.

We at The Scallion only regret that we are still on hiatus and thus do not have the time to write the article that goes with this piquant headline.

******
This plea was written to our elected and selected officials to hold the chimposter (aka Smirky McFlightsuit) accountable for his many crimes in office, including the use of illegal wiretapping and domestic spying to silence dissent and activism for progressive causes. Luckily for us at The Scallion, we're not holding our breath.

How much more are we supposed to take?

Crime 1: Bush stole the 2000 election.

Since that went so well, he stole 2004, too.

Granted, he had help from his brother Jeb, from his buddy who counts the votes in Ohio, from ChoicePoint, and from Diebold.

But the fact remains that Bush has never been a legitimate President of the United States.

Crime 2: Bush failed even to attempt to guard against the unique, imminent, and pressing threat of al Qaeda, despite briefings, warnings, and other information he received.

Americans are left wondering from his attitude whether Bush was too stupid to take the threat seriously or whether he welcomed the 9-11 attacks as the "new Pearl Harbor" he needed to justify invading Iraq, which, oddly enough, he *knew* had nothing to do with al Qaeda or 9-11.

Crime 3: Bush and his entire administration consistently mislead and lied to the American public regarding justifications for invading Iraq.

More than enough proof can be found here:

http://democrats.reform.house.gov/IraqOnTheRecord/
pdf_admin_iraq_on_the_record_rep.pdf


Crime 4: Bush oversaw and approved the kidnapping of Haiti's Jean Bertrand Aristide, who is, unlike Bush, a democratically elected leader of his nation.

Apparently, in places like Iraq and Haiti, Bush prefers to foment death and destruction rather than democracy and hope.

Crime 5: Bush has consistently shown that he believes himself above the law.

During his "reckless youth," which apparently stretched well into his thirties, Bush earned convictions for DUIs in Maine; he paid for abortions before Roe v Wade legalized them in America; and he skipped out on his cushy Texas Air National Guard job while more responsible men his age were risking their lives fighting overseas.

In the Oval Office, Bush has striven to divorce America from the Geneva conventions, to legalize torture, to incarcerate political prisoners and prisoners of war without even lip service to the due process of the law, and to strip Americans who disagree with him of their civil rights.

Illegal wiretapping and other forms of illegal search and seizure fall into the latest category of crimes for which Bush is directly responsible. He has shown himself time and time again to be incapable of handling authority without severely abusing it.

It is way past time to IMPEACH BUSH NOW!!

TOO LATE! WE'RE TOAST!

And remember the incoming Administration?
We want to look forward, not backward. 
Okay then...good thing your ass isn't on fire!

Another desperate plea to government officials and local newspapers to hold Bush accountable for illegal wiretapping and domestic spying:

George W. Bush is NOT above the law, and he is NOT THE LAW!

In the history of our once-great nation, no other occupant of the Oval Office has ever shown such rampant disrespect and disregard for the rule of law as George W. Bush.

It’s not enough that Bush and his cohorts consider the Geneva Conventions sufficiently “quaint” to lock up and torture prisoners without charges, trials, or access to legal aid.

No, Bush thinks it’s perfectly acceptable to skip the rubber stamp of FISA by spying on Americans without warrants or probably cause.

Given how accommodating FISA and FISC are, it is unconscionable for Bush to pursue such illegal domestic spying.

There is only one reason to skirt FISA wholesale: not even the FISA rubber-stamp would approve what Bush is doing!

Illegal domestic spying is not about tracking terrorists: it's about a potential breach of the Constitution.

The administration’s claims that the spying program is narrow and is limited to people with ties to al Qaeda are illogical: Mr. Bush ALREADY has the authority to track terrorists; last time I checked, al Qaeda qualified for that epithet.

Further, the New York Times, which has been one of Bush’s biggest Iraq war cheerleaders, reports the facts differently, saying the data was overwhelming and often led to spying on innocent Americans.

Despite White House claims accusing only Democrats of objecting, both Republicans and Democrats believe Mr. Bush may have broken the law: Republicans like Lindsey Graham, Sam Brownback, John McCain, and Arlen Specter have offered some of the harshest criticism of the program.

Congress never gave Mr. Bush authority to conduct the secret program, despite contradictory claims of authority to conduct secret wiretaps gratis a post 9-11 Congressional resolution.

The non-partisan Congressional Research Service found that the resolution didn't authorize the program and found it "unlikely" that any court would agree with the White House's “justifications.”

It is time for Mr. Bush to obey the laws he swore to uphold and protect, including our Constitution!

******
This plea was written to our elected and selected officials to seek lobbying reform. Luckily for us at The Scallion, we're not holding our breath on this issue, either.

Lobbying threatens our democracy! Ya think?

Our founding fathers were wise enough to realize that governments can be bought and sold by individuals and organizations with sufficient funds.

This, my friends, is corruption, plain and simple.

The corruption caused by lobbying and pandering to special interests ensures that the government represents ONLY society's MOST powerful--yet government is pledged to represent ALL Americans, including if not especially the LEAST powerful who have nowhere else to turn.

Please be a true American hero: restore integrity, morality, responsibility, and accountability to our government by reining in lobbying and putting an end to corruption.

Since everyone does well when everyone does well, even the corporations will come to thank you someday.

******
The piece below was written by a Scallion staffer in response to one of those ignorant broadcast flame-mails that purports that the ACLU is wrong to fight for separation of church and state because, since “God” is mentioned in all 50 states’ constitutions, preambles, and other laws, church and state are not really separate.

I often wonder whether the people who send around things like this really understand what the separation between church and state means.

It does not mean that the people who wrote this or that preamble or constitution, be it federal, state, or local, were atheists.

Neither does it mean that they were all protestant Christian, Catholic, Muslim, Jewish, or whatever else.

It simply means that no single religion is permitted to enjoy favored status with the government.

The whole idea behind this notion is that, if the government does not favor one religion over another, then it will not persecute those who do not belong to the favored religion.

If the ACLU is wrong to fight for this ideal, then I am wrong to support them because it seems like plain common sense to me.

Too often, I see pieces like this being broadcast to promote the dismantling of our civil right not to be Christian and to promote exclusive control of the government by fascist-Christian (as opposed to true Christian) interests.

Yes, I actually know people who think making our government explicitly Christian would be the best thing for the country--and I don't think they realize that the Christians who would be running the show are not their own parish priests and ministers but the rich and powerful Jerry Falwells of the world, who have an agenda that Jesus Christ would not recognize as his own.

It seems to me that the implication of losing this civil rights battle falls very little short of an American Taliban where people like me will no longer recognize America as the free and fair nation it used to be.

When you determine to hold fast to sacred expressions you hold dear, you are witnessing first-hand the beauty of the separation between church and state!

By law, you are accorded the civil right to say all those sacred words and to hold dear all those wonderful celebrations without being beholden to someone who would have you do or think differently. This is what the ACLU is fighting for!

The only difference between you and someone else is that that other person chooses to say or hold dear other words or traditions or even none at all.

It is just as foolish to expect someone who doesn't believe in God to say "one nation under God" as it would be to demand you or me to say "one nation under the flying spaghetti monster" just because flying spaghetti monster worshipers came into majority.

Similarly, you and I should never be forced to omit "under God" just because atheists are in the majority.

The separation between church and state allows each of us to worship as we choose--or not.

What makes the ACLU great is that it fights for the equal protection of all groups.

This prevents each minority from having its rights trampled by the majority.

As a woman, I find it very comforting that the ACLU is out there protecting my rights so that they will not be trampled by the people who, by their enormous wealth, have so much more power than I do.

So, yes, I find the rights of minorities to be very important, since, as a woman, I count as a minority in the sense of having less political clout than a man.

Even if I don't personally agree with what some or other minority wants for itself, I respect its right to pursue its civil rights and its dreams.

To me, it's all about protecting minorities from the tyranny of majorities.

This is what America was founded on--it's why the Puritans left England. Even though I don't agree with everything the Puritans ever said or did, I still think it's a great ideal.

Lastly, I want to share a thought regarding "Merry Christmas" and "Happy Holidays."

I've been saying "Happy Holidays" for years because, to me, that expression encapsulates what I was taught regarding the "holiday season," which I always understood to include Thanksgiving, Christmas or Hanukkah, and New Year's.

I tend to use "Happy Holidays" between Thanksgiving and Christmas; "Merry Christmas" or "Happy Hanukkah" as Christmas and Hanukkah approach; and "Happy New Year" just after Christmas.

I also use "Happy Holidays" when I am not sure whether I am addressing a Christian. To me, it is a joyful expression that wishes all the joys of the entire holiday season to whomever I am addressing.

I've never seen "Happy Holidays" as detracting from Christmas, and it mystifies me that some people have chosen to perceive it that way: similarly, do we as Americans really want to demote Thanksgiving and New Year's from enjoying holiday status simply because they are not Christian holidays?

It seems to me that the whole thing is a tempest in a teapot that is designed to turn people against each other by making them choose sides in an either-or that does not really exist.

******
The essay below denouncing Samuel Alito as a Supreme Court nominee was not written by or for The Scallion, but it expresses The Scallion's point of view to a tee.

Scallion staffers promulgated it to their elected and selected officials in the hopes of changing the disastrous outcome...for which we can all thank the spineless "Democrats."

http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2006/1/8/204534/2589

" I must save this government if possible.

What I cannot do, of course I will not do; but it may as well be understood, once for all, that I shall not surrender this game leaving any available card unplayed." - Abraham Lincoln

When Lincoln said that, it was a Civil War which threatened to divide our country.

Today, there isn't a war between citizen and citizen, but between citizen and government.

Why?

Because the Bush administration has attacked the interests of the American people, squandered its fortune, and caused so many to die in war.

Today's divide is not between north and south, but between the people and its government, a government which has proved over the last few years that it is created by and for the powerful rather than the citizenry of these United States.

There are times when a certain form of governance becomes toxic, where those in the public trust act not as civil servants, but as self-serving politicos.

We are living in such a time.

The Congress no longer belongs to ordinary Americans; it belongs to the lobbyist who can cut the largest check.

The Presidency no longer leads, but misleads.

And the Judiciary (specifically the Supreme Court) is set to belong to the most vile, extreme, and un-American element of our society.

Democrats can either surrender this government to a party which seeks to destroy it, or we can take Lincoln's advice and play our available cards.

To those who say filibusters--judicial, patriot act, etc--are too politically costly, I say that failure to filibuster is conceding that this nation isn't worth fighting for.

Instead of worrying that we will be labeled "obstructionist," I say we filibuster Alito, filibuster the Patriot Act, filibuster time and time again until this crazy government comes to a screeching halt.

Enough is enough.

The list of scandals is overshadowed only by the list of names of the 2,190 whose deaths have yet to be honored by this administration.

At what point will our party realize that it's not just the midterm elections at stake here?

Politics is secondary to the fact that our country has changed, drastically, over the last several years.

What is that change?

It is the unraveling of the American flag thread by thread.

It is erasing the Bill of Rights letter by letter.

It is, ultimately, about waking up one day and not recognizing this great society as the "America" we know and love.

This new year requires a new attitude by the Democratic Party.

The party must acknowledge the gravity of the political climate today.

It is not a time to crack jokes on Sunday talk shows; it is not a time to mince words or to parrot political consultants.

It is a time to speak with the courage and conviction that is required when one is fighting for the heart of their country.

Democrats will not win by pledging to "do better."

We will not gain a majority or even the Presidency in 2008 by approaching the American people as politicians.

If we are to win, we must rediscover what it means to serve at the will of the people.

We must show voters that we are willing to fight, not just talk, for their interests.

Time and time again, we've heard pundits gleefully recount the fact that the GOP is suffering, but the Democrats can't capitalize on it.

It's true, to an extent.

Where Bush is at 40% approval, he should be at 10%.

Where we are ahead in congressional polling by 10 points, we should be ahead by 30.

Why have we not been able to react properly to the plethora of scandals the GOP has laid before us?

Because of fear.

Fear is what stifles the speech of our leaders, tying their tongues so they can't say the word "LIE."

They write letters blasting the administration, but it is fear that holds them back from expressing the same level of outrage when speaking on national television.

Fear is what caused so many Democrats to run away from Murtha's plan.

We fail as a party not because we lack conviction, but because our words and actions are paralyzed by fear.

We're afraid to be labeled as cowards, as commies, as traitors.

And in those rare moments when Democrats have spoken based on conscience rather than poll numbers, we, the party faithful, get all excited.

The blogosphere buzzes with cheers for the "smackdown".

Thousands of comments are dedicated to the discovery of "a spine."

But what does it say about our party that we rejoice in what should be a commonplace event?

A Democrat speaking clearly, truthfully, and following through on his speech should not be an anomaly.

It should be the norm in our party. Yet where there should be outrage and action on the part of our leaders, we get instead silence or mealy-mouthed platitudes and ineffective soundbites.

If you're anything like me (read: a political junkie who loves her country), then you're thoroughly exhausted.

You're tired of being outraged by scandal after scandal.

You're sick of waiting for the truth to be exposed.

Your heart is still filled with sorrow from the 2000 and 2004 elections, because you mourn for what this country could have been, and what it has become.

WE get it.

We're the heart of the party: the ones working ourselves to the bone day after day.

We're the ones without healthcare, the ones with our family members serving overseas.

We're the ones kicked out of public events and placed on watchlists because of our political beliefs.

We're the ones with kids who are taught "intelligent design" as part of the war against science.

We're the ones who can't get married, the ones whose homes are subject to sneak and peek searches, the ones who have to wait 12 hours to vote and who pray that our votes will actually be counted.

It is us, goddammit, who truly realize what this country has become and where it is headed.

It is our rights being stripped away from us, our America slipping away before our eyes.

All we ask is that our party recognize this.

That a holistic approach towards government is needed.

That while the Democrats focus on individual battles, it is our entire government which needs to be saved.

As Lincoln noted, our nation will never be destroyed from the outside.

We are the world's greatest military power.

No terrorist or rogue nation will ever be able to destroy us. Not with hijacked planes or nukes or cavalries.

No, if we are to be destroyed, it will be from within--because we destroyed ourselves.

It will be because we, as a party, were too afraid, too complacent to stand up as the Constitution is being pried from our clenching hands.

I admit, I've let myself get hopeful about our party's effectiveness.

Bursts of courage, from Murtha to Feingold, have led me to conclude that our party is up to the task of saving this government.

But a little part of me anxiously fears that such instances of courage may be isolated events, rather than a shift in our party's approach to politics.

Now is the time for courage.

Now is the time for our party to realize the enormous task before us: saving this government.

If we embrace that theme, we will once again know victory.

And that victory will not just be defined by how many congressmen have a "D" after their name.

It will be defined, ultimately, by restoring America to the nation it once was: a nation with a government for the people, by the people, and the greatest country on earth.
                                               The Scallion

Pro-life Mania Sweeps the Nation

July 29, 2002. Across the nation, a new pro-life fervor is sweeping through every city, town, and neighborhood.

The good feeling begun by the recent passage of the mandatory organ donation law seems to have galvanized devout pro-lifers all over the country into action.

Fresh new sentiments can be heard over the crowds as they gather. “Harassing people at abortion clinics may be anti-abortion, but it isn’t pro-life,” a 40-ish man was heard to proclaim.

 “Yeah—it’s not as easy as that.

There’s a lot more to it,” a slim teenage woman added, “If we’re really serious about calling ourselves ‘pro-life,’ then we need to help people improve their quality of life.

We should have been teaching men and women all along how to prevent unwanted pregnancies instead of just bashing women after they were already pregnant and it was too late.

That would have improved the quality of life for everybody.”

Other voices added, “Yeah!

Then, instead of being stuck on welfare only able to afford junk food, those women could have finished their educations and gotten jobs.

The the children they ultimately chose to have would have had much better lives, maybe even with real dads.”

And the new sentiment doesn’t stop there.

This new generation of pro-lifers is taking on anything and everything that they perceive as eroding the quality of life.

“I had a woman stop by my house the other day, saying that she was a new generation pro-lifer and that she wanted to teach me about the new pro-life tenets,” said Mrs. Flora Hapless of Bayonne, NJ.

“Well, since she wasn’t panhandling for money, I thought it might be nice to hear what she had to say.

But then she pushed past me and barged into my house.

I couldn’t believe it when she took every last carton of ciggies out of the cabinet and threw them into her over-sized trash bag.

But I figured, hey, I know smoking isn’t good for me—this lady is just trying to help.

But then she took all the Oreos and Fig Newtons and Doritos and potato chips—all my kids’ snacks—even their Sugar Corn Pops and Chocolate Frosted Sugar Bombs for breakfast and threw them away, too.

Well, I was stunned, but she wasn’t even done yet.

She cleaned out every last scrap of meat from my freezer into her big ominous bag.

She did the same exact thing to the fridge—no more milk, no eggs, our leftover meatloaf is gone … ”

She chuckled, “Well, if she hadn’t dumped that, I probably would have.

Anyway, she cleaned out our whole kitchen—she left me with nothing to cook for dinner but a head of iceberg lettuce, three carrots, and a grape.

And I thought, ‘OK, I’m sure I can make do with that.’

But then she threw out all our bottles of salad dressing.

Then she pulled out the stove and cut its power cord, saying that we should really eat our fruits and veggies raw anyway.

But she still wasn’t done—she marches straight into the family room and pulls out our new big screen TV and cuts its power cord … right in the middle of Pokemon, which is the only time of day that my three kids give me a moment’s peace.

Then, she left, taking her big—now stuffed—trash bag with her.

And she said, ‘Mark my words—you and your family will have a much improved quality of life now.’

I’m sure she was right, but now I have three hungry, cranky, fussy kids on my hands and no food in the fridge and a hungry husband on his way home from the mill expecting dinner.

I guess it’s off to McDonald’s tonight.

God, I need a smoke.”
                                                            --The Scallion