maga--i.e., the republicans--presented Congress with what for them was a win-win scenario: either pass this gawd-awful continuing resolution that gives musktrumputin w-a-a-a-a-ay too much power but keeps the government open-ish, or blame Democrats for shutting the government down.
It's like having to decide between sawing the baby in half to give one half each to the two women claiming it as theirs or keeping it alive by turning it over to the woman whose only intention is to torture, torment, and abuse it for as long as she inhumanly can.
Crockett and Bernie had the long view in mind: shut down the government to stop the musktrumputin power-grab.
This is a worthy goal, and I was hoping that Democrats as a whole would adopt it...until I started thinking about the impact of the kind of government shutdown that republicans had in mind.
Schumer held his nose and supported the continuing resolution because he knows that real Americans--innocent people whom republicans see only as pawns and grist for their mill--would suffer real consequences from a shut-down.
republicans fully intended on shutting the government down for over a month to circumvent hiring-firing rules in civil service. They planned to leave the government shut down for so long that they could swoop in and fire thousands upon thousands of devoted, hard-working career civil servants without cause and without recourse.
On top of that, shutting the government down stops government contracts, leading to mass lay-offs in the commercial sector that engineers and builds the solutions we rely on every day (Internet, anyone? GPS, anyone?).
The brain drain, which would have impaired our ability to keep pace with the rest of the world technologically, would have been immense and likely permanent: many of those affected would simply refuse to return to such an unstable business area, and many would join the record numbers of Americans emigrating and expatriating.
The silver lining, if you could call it that, would be the number of maga rank and file harmed by the shutdown, and that j-u-u-u-u-ust might have helped educate them regarding what the government is actually supposed to do and how the government is actually supposed to function. (The government is supposed to serve the American people, not "hurt the right people," not "make a profit.") Oh sure, as Crockett says, they'd have blamed Democrats for it --but, as she rightly says, they blame Democrats anyway, even-and-especially whenever their own guy does something horrible.
By not shutting the government down, there's a very real chance that Chuck Schumer saved my transgender friend's 43-year pension--you know, the pension she earned because she worked long hours for low pay to serve the public good...the pension she earned in lieu of Social Security.
My friend turned in her retirement paperwork about a week ago, but the timing of the shutdown would very likely have given republican transphobes just enough runway to fire my friend before her retirement kicked in and she could receive her pension.
They'd have literally robbed her of her life savings so they could give it to people like musk who never earned it and who do not need it.
And then there's Medicare, Medicaid, Social Security, the Veterans' Administration, and every other agency and service that keeps Americans alive and well every day.
A government shutdown would have decimated the ability of these organizations to serve Americans who depend on them to stay alive.
In other words, by avoiding shutting down the government, Chuck Schumer and others who voted like him literally voted to save countless lives of America's most vulnerable.
So while I agree with and admire Crockett and Bernie's realism and strength in the face of musktrumputin's growing fascism, I can't disagree with Schumer's approach, either. Either way, innocent Americans would suffer. Either way, innocent Americans would die. Either way, there are nasty short-term consequences. Either way, there are nasty long-term consequences.
So, yeah, again, republicans won, and again, Americans lost.