Monday, January 02, 2006

Happy New Year!

Dot Calm’s Special Wish for a Prosperous 2006!

It’s a new year. Why not think innovation? Why not think of something completely off the wall? Something that would distinguish you as a creative and conscientious thinker…one willing to demonstrate by example, willing to make a measurable commitment to the earth’s well-being while not being viewed as a complete tree hugger? Are you bold enough to break with the S**t-Ugly-Van (SUV) crowd? Would you be strong enough to withstand the surprise of your friends and family? Would you have enough confidence to get off the big, bigger, biggest mentality being fed to us by American automakers? Could you break the lock-step march to the destruction of Earth’s bounty? Do you have enough mental fortitude to turn away from the clearance sales offered by auto dealers? Enough strength of character to swim against the tide? Could you be gracious in handling admiration from fellow Americans? If so, it may be time for you to seriously consider driving a hybrid!

The joys of driving a hybrid are many. Google this exciting technology in automobile development. My experience is limited to the Toyota Prius. It has lived up to my every expectation. Road test a hybrid today! You owe it to yourself. You owe it to Mother Earth.

Requiem

Eugene McCarthy, 89 and
Richard Pryor, 65
Both men died on December 10th, 2005.
That seems to be all they had in common.

It is interesting how Eugene McCarthy, and his activism against the Vietnam War, was a peripheral issue to me. In the early ‘60s, I was a young mother raising two daughters. Parenting is hard work, to use a Bush euphemism. Frankly, his description of hard work has nothing to do with parenting, commitment, or honor. A child is a blank canvas on which one paints faith, hope, love, and, above all, HONOR. And that, my friends, takes a lot of hard work!

You can google Senator Eugene McCarthy’s biography for an accurate history of his contribution to our great country. When McCarthy ran for the presidency, he directly opposed Lyndon Baines Johnson. McCarthy was adamantly opposed to the Vietnam War. The people in our country were divided and overwhelmed with unrest. America was jerking and jolting its way through a nasty phase of its history. Americans witnessed the gruesome reality of war day after day as it played out on televisions in every living room. Flag-draped coffins were off-loaded night after night, reminding us of the terrible cost of war. The message was clear. My goal, in those chaotic days, was to protect my sweet, innocent babies in a country suffering a nervous breakdown.

During the McCarthy days, we worshiped at a progressive church. Remember, it was the ‘60s, and the churches seemed to be suffering a degree of unrest, too. We heard of Catholic priest after Catholic priest leaving their vocation. Our little family attended Mass in several different parishes, traveling up to forty-five minutes to any particular one in an attempt to protect our babies. We didn’t always succeed. Hence, there was the ultimate experience of a sandal-clad priest distributing Ash Wednesday ashes from an infantry helmet.

Although the ‘60s were troubling, one must look back in admiration at the country’s citizenry. Americans everywhere expressed their dissent with the status quo through music, art, civil disobedience, dress (or lack thereof), and writings. Today’s message seems clear: the masses must demonstrate, peacefully or otherwise.

McCarthy knew it could be done. He knew that an inept government could be overthrown by a national movement. Likewise, this year, America saw irrefutable evidence of a national movement in the massive number of marchers that showed up on August 24, 2005, in Washington, DC. That was a peaceful march not only to support Cindy Sheehan but to demonstrate love for our country. We must continue to demonstrate all across America, just as did the peaceniks of yesteryear. We must rescue our democracy. A substantial number of Americans is eager to take back the country. It will be messy, but it will be democracy at its finest. In the ‘60s, McCarthy had a vision. Americans chose a different path. Let’s not make that mistake again.

The Revolution Starts Now!

-----

Just imagine hearing that Richard Pryor set himself on fire free-basing. That didn’t seem particularly unusual during the ‘60s and ‘70s! Just another nutcase, I thought. As it turns out, Pryor was the same age as I am. That explains what attracted me to him and his crude, absurd humor.

Pryor used his craft to point out the inequities hidden in our society: inequities based solely on the shade of one’s skin. We didn’t get it then; we don’t get it now. There is nothing funny about discrimination. Not since Pryor has anyone even tried to teach that.

What is happening to our democracy isn’t funny, either. Not even Pryor’s edgy humor would help.

Let’s learn some new words!

Which best describes America?

Democracy--government by the people. A government in which the supreme power is vested in the people and exercised by them directly or indirectly through a system of representation, usually involving periodically held free elections.

Fascism--a political philosophy, movement, or regime that exalts nation, and often race, above the individual and that stands for a centralized autocratic government headed by a dictatorial leader, severe economic and social regimentation, and forcible suppression of opposition.

Corporatocracy--regime of, by, and for a coalition of government, banks, and corporations.

Oligarchy--government in which a small group exercises control, especially for corrupt and selfish purposes.

Theocracy--government of a state by immediate divine guidance or by officials who are regarded as divinely guided.

Monarchy--government having a hereditary chief-of-state with life tenure and powers varying from nominal to absolute.

Plutocracy--government by the wealthy.

Did you know...

The FEMA account has consistently been raided and the funds used by Homeland security?

Hurricanes in Florida are covered by FEMA before they hit?

The mayor of New Orleans and the governor of Louisiana called George W. Bush Monday night after the levees broke? Bush slept.
And don’t forget Condi’s shoe shopping spree on 5th Avenue while Louisiana drowned.

Climate change has NEVER been covered on CNN?

189 countries are working to solve the global warming problem without any help from the US?
US attitude regarding global warming: no need to do anything!

The US has a $5.4 TRILLION cash deficit annually for the next four decades?

The Bush administration wanted to do away with the Davis-Bacon Act as it applies in the Katrina area so that companies like Halliburton wouldn’t be obligated to pay the prevailing minimum wage?

Dot Calm’s cure for idle hands

If you have some free time, here are some sites and sources you might like to explore.

Interesting Sites:
* blogspot.com (Build your own free blog!)
* refdesk.com (Read newspapers from around the world)
* rawstory.com
* cursor.org
* opensecrets.org
* tvnews.org
* ob.org (Operation Blessing, the Stephen Bennett Ministries)
* mediamapping.org (Paul Moran)
* nccp.org (National Center for Children in Poverty)
* thefedpress.org
* veteransforpeace.org
* peopleforpeace.com
* thinkprogress.org
* knoxnews.com
* nocrony.com
* mediachannel.org
* topplebush.com

Interesting Books:
* Promises Betrayed: Waking Up From The American Dream by Bob Herbert (Op-Ed NYT columnist)
* Running on Empty by Pete Peterson
* Pensions in Crisis by Karen Ferguson
* America Can Do Better by Mark Green
* Proud by Heather Small

Interesting DVDs:
* The High Cost of Low Prices (Walmart)
* ACLU (4 short DVDs–can be watched free on the ACLU site)

Dot Calm’s Thought for the Day

TAKE ONE ACTION EVERY DAY
TO SAVE OUR DEMOCRACY!

Dot Calm’s mailbag

And now … here are two political letters that I have felt compelled to write based on the deep and lasting peril in which our democracy currently falters. The first is one I recently wrote inquiring into the status of the Social Security Trust Fund. Its factual content came from a letter written some time ago by Representative Dennis Kucinich. The second letter is about the deafening silence of our media, which collectively are supposed to act as the American public’s watchdog. Interestingly, while the letter was sent to every major news outlet in America, only The News Hour with Jim Lehrer responded, thus confirming that our media are observing strict silence regarding the issues that really matter to a strong democracy. I am reposting this letter now as an introduction to mention a book that deserves to be read by every American who cares about preserving our democracy. Just keep reading down …

-----
January 4, 2006

(Recipients: my local Congressman and the Ways and Means committee)

Subject: Social Security

Dear Congressman:

Happy New Year! There is a growing concern regarding the status of the Social Security Trust Fund since the April 26, 2005, Ways and Means committee killed a Resolution of Inquiry which would have required the President to produce documentation supporting his oft-repeated claim that there is no Social Security Trust.

If the President’s assertions remain unchallenged, the Administration can continue to drain the Trust Fund of its assets and make true its now false claim that Social Security has no Trust Fund and is going bankrupt. The Administration only needs the complicity of the Congress.

According to the Social Security Administration’s own trustees, Social Security has $1.68 TRILLION in the Trust Fund. According to the bi-partisan Congressional Budget Office, that surplus will grow to over $6 TRILLION by 2028.

The President’s assertion that there is no Trust Fund comes at a time when the Administration has borrowed over $67 BILLION from the Fund. That borrowed money is, in effect, being used to help fund an illegal war and to pay for tax cuts for the wealthiest Americans.

It seems to me the President has a Constitutional obligation to uphold the public debt of the United States. Social Security’s financial obligations are, according to the Social Security Trustees, backed by the full faith and credit of the United States.

Will someone please advise me of the current status of The Social Security Trust Fund?

Sincerely,

Dot Calm

-----
March 4, 2005

(Recipients: every major news outlet in America, e.g., Newsweek)

Attn: Editor

Subj: The Silenced American Press

I’ve come full circle. Heard about/read about McCarthyism, where American citizens were accused of everything from communist sympathy (ending careers, ruining reputations) to spying (Ethel and Julius Rosenberg). Those were not our finest hours.

I’m struck by the lack of sound and fury--the deafening silence--in today’s press. Intense investigation hounded the Clinton administration daily. Remember? New accusations lodged constantly. Remember Ken Starr? Remember the millions upon millions of dollars that were spent investigating the Clintons during the Clinton administration?

Those people must be hiding something, we thought.

Fast forward to the present administration. Let’s start with the president.

Did he dodge the draft? Did he receive preferential treatment regarding National Guard? Was he ever absent without permission? What was the BCCI scandal all about? Remember the BCCI scandal? How was the Bush family involved in BCCI? Did this president ever engage in insider trading to the tune of $600M with Harken Energy? We imprisoned Martha Stewart for a comparatively paltry $40K. Shouldn’t George W. Bush’s record be investigated as robustly? More importantly, would it withstand investigation?

Then came an image of decent folk smashing Dixie Chicks CDs. Remember why? A Dixie Chick made an unflattering remark, thereby demonstrating a “lack of patriotism.” Better stay in line, we thought, lest we’re Dixie Chicked. How opportune it was that some reporter’s camera was present to record the event.

Our president assures us that he didn’t invade Iraq for its oil. Has anyone from the media investigated why we invaded Iraq? What percentage of voters were for/against the initial invasion? How would those numbers look today? Despite the media’s lack of coverage, anti-war protests began long before the invasion and continue to today. Don’t we as Americans have the right to know what our friends, family members, and neighbors are thinking as they participate in these protests? Don’t we deserve to know that not every American backs this war?

And what about recent voting manipulation in this country--isn’t that an important issue that every American deserves to know about? Why was there a media lock-down on coverage of Republican fraud, misconduct, and abuse during the 2000 and 2004 presidential elections? Don’t the American people deserve to know?

I respectfully include a list of additional subjects begging thorough investigation. Voters in this country, myself included, hunger for the degree of effort put forth during the Clinton/Lewinsky scandal, OJ Simpson murders, and Watergate, to name a few.

Gannon/Guckertgate
The Conyers Report
Job Exportation (Why/Where)
Medicare Cuts and Big Pharm Pork
Fright Mail to Seniors (Discouraging Voting)
Food for Oil Program
Effects of Tax Cuts
Halliburton Profits
Environmental (Nuclear Waste)
U.S. Policy on Torture
America’s Reputation
Military Budget & White Collar Welfare
Privatizing Social Security
Perfect Storm: Fascism/PNAC/Christian Right

These are dangerous times for America; the balance of power has been usurped by a neo-fascist regime. It has been accomplished in a bloodless coup. Please consider exploring/exposing some or all the topics listed above. I’m hopeful aggressive investigation will result in a better future for our country and not the impending disaster that appears inevitable if it continues on the present tack.

Sincerely,

Dot Calm

A Dot Calm book review

FEET TO THE FIRE: The Media After 9/11
by Kristina Borjesson

As reviewed on AlterNet (www.alternet.org/mediaculture/29833/) by Laura Barcella

This book asks America's top journalists for insights on why post-9/11, pre-Iraq War news coverage was so shoddy.

From a telephone interview Barcella conducted with Borjesson, here are some salient quotations:

The bottom line for me is to try to examine the best journalists out there, and see what it is about them and how they go about doing their work. And in the course of it, I just exposed a lot of stuff.

The thing that I found really profound was that there really was no consensus among the nation's top messengers about why we went to war. And I still don't think the American people are clear about it.

The other thing that I found interesting was looking into why their reporting didn't get the kind of traction it should. The reason why their reporting didn't get traction was because their reporting wasn't on television.

The other thing that was very clear in the pre-war phase was that the relationship between the White House (the executive branch) and the public, and the executive branch and the Congress has changed profoundly. Walter Pincus mentioned that.

There were plenty of nonmainstream media outlets reporting the real story. But I was trying to look at the most powerful outlets I could find that were doing a good job. And basically what I'm doing with this book is bringing these people to the public's attention and saying, forget about Chris Matthews on Hardball. Go ahead and watch Hardball if you want, but if you want the real nuts-and-bolts reporting, go to Knight Ridder. Look at what John Walcott, Jonathan Landy, Warren Strobel are doing.

There is so much more to Borjesson's "FEET TO THE FIRE." It was not unpatriotic of her to ask pointed questions. It will not be unpatriotic of us to read the book.