Have I told you how much I hate these people? - Mike Malloy. It is every thinking person’s responsibility not to side with his or her executioners. - Albert Camus. Popular democracy anywhere threatens fascism everywhere. - The Scallion. A fascist junta of neocons using George W. Bush as its shill has taken over America by bloodless coup. What will it take for us to stage a revolution and take our country back? - Dot Calm. Drive a hybrid. Leave a lighter footprint on the planet. - Dot Calm.
Like Granny D, I have watched my own beloved country change, and I am angry beyond words about what I see. I grew up seeing America as the equivalent of the movie good guy, the hero in the white hat who came to the rescue of those in need around the world. I have watched in silent horror as the corporations, the captains and the kings of industry, used a comparatively small outlay of cash to buy the Republicans to use as their shills. George W. Bush is the puppet cowboy-king of shills, the proverbial emperor with no clothes. Every day, I watch these evil men legalize, legitimize, and institutionalize robbing the poor to pay the rich. They are carving up America like a giant carcass and doling out choice chunks of its meat to themselves and their cronies. Since the Democrats have been sipping at the same corporate teat where the Republicans have been gorging for the past generation, the fascists are free to do their worst; there is no longer any opposition. There is no one left to stand up for the rights of the American people, the Constitution, or the democracy, which I fear will be replaced by a fascist dictatorship in my lifetime. Wake up, America: we need a REVOLUTION NOW!
Well whaddayagno, everyone--we survived another week and are now free to enjoy Friday, the Pastafarian high holy day. Woo hoo!
Again, I'm not up to an essay today; again, I think today's post speaks for itself. The summary for those with short attention spans (as if you'd be here in the first place if you had a short attention span!) is that Donald Trump sucks, and Hillary ain't much better.
I was listening to "Democracy Now!" earlier this week (link below)--Amy Goodman was interviewing Jill Stein, a medical doctor who's running as the presidential candidate on the Green party ticket. Stein makes some interesting points. We all know that Trump is running as a populist, often to the left of Hillary, and we all know that there isn't a snowball's chance in hell that he'd keep any of the promises he makes to ordinary Americans. But what about Hillary? If you listen to what she and Obama say, they definitely sound more populist than the Republicans, who are unabashedly against helping the middle and lower classes. But what about what Hillary and Obama actually do? Do their rational, compassionate words really drive their actions and their voting records? No, according to Stein--they are just as corporatist as the Republicans if you look at their voting records. (The Silenced Majority, by Amy Goodman, bears this out with the example of Obama's outright obstruction on climate change. Now there's a conversation I can't believe we're still having.)
My Tea Party Christian friend, who thinks O'Bama is a far-left Marxist communist socialist weak dictator, would choke on the reality of that statement, which is obvious to us Bernie supporters. (Maybe he believes that Hawaii is in Kenya just like Trump believes that Indiana is in Mexico. But I digress.)
As Stein points out, the Democratic party has been as resistant to change as ever we've accused conservatives of being--remember Ralph Nader's many presidential runs, trying to pull Democrats back from the right to the center? If a movement as strong as Bernie's isn't even causing them to flinch, then nothing will. Democrats have proven for the past thirty years that they're not friendly to the middle and lower classes--remember Bill Clinton's welfare cuts and repeal of Glass-Steagall?--which means that it's going to take a third party for progressive agendas to see the light of day in any meaningful way beyond mere lip service for the masses, be the speaker Trump or Hillary.
So, Stein presents the dilemma: keep voting for the lesser evil--Hillary--or start voting for the greater good, be that writing in Bernie or voting for Stein herself.
Stein makes some powerful points that have not escaped me--in fact, those same points have been giving me agita. But I do feel like Hillary would at least give us some breathing room once Trump is dispatched back to the funny pages where he belongs.
And, like Bernie, I do NOT want to be responsible for a Trump presidency.
Kyle Kulinski of Secular Talk offers the following suggestion: if you're in a swing state, vote Hillary; if you're in a clear red or clear blue state where your vote is not going to make a tremendous difference, then vote your conscience.
I think that's pretty good advice, and I plan to follow it simply because the specter of a Trump administration is just too ghastly to consider. I do NOT want him or any other Repube picking SCOTUS justices.
And, if we prevail, I will turn my efforts full force into getting Bernie or someone like him into the White House in 2020.
Don't forget to read Dot Calm's shadow's favorite independent sources of news and information:
...And, whatever you do, please keep supporting Bernie's "revolution"--back to the center. Send him a buck o' five if you can. At the very least, I'm gonna send $15 to Debbie Wasserman Schultz's Democratic primary opponent, Tim Canova, on Bernie's behalf. That woman needs to GO!
Thanks for reading, and thanks for being good to yourself and your loved ones. If you have a senior friend or rellie, please visit, bring cookies, or take him or her out for a meal if you can. They and I will love you for it! And don't forget to sleep in tomorrow!
Peas!
- Dot Calm's shadow
********************************************
Mailbag
From EMILY'S List via Daily Kos--support women voters with pro-choice Democratic women
By helping pro-choice Democratic women win races at all levels, women
voters can make 2016 the year we take back the Senate, send even more
women to the House, champion greater diversity in our government, and
finally shatter the biggest glass ceiling of them all.
In an election year where the presumptive Republican presidential
nominee has said that “there has to be some form of punishment” for
women who have abortions, it’s more important than ever for women to
flex their voting power and make sure their point of view is
represented.
This year, women voters can play a historic role in one of the most important elections of our time – because when women vote, women and families win. Join EMILY’s List to support pro-choice Democratic women and make history this year.
Now that Donald Trump is attacking a federal judge over his Hispanic
heritage, Mark Kirk is finally trying to hide from previously endorsing
Trump.
It shouldn’t have taken this long. Kirk told a reporter Tuesday that Trump’s latest remarks were “too racist and bigoted” -- as if a little less racism and bigotry were just fine.
Illinois deserves a senator who didn’t need to face a massive
political backlash to know that Donald Trump is unfit for the
presidency. Contribute now to send Tammy to the U.S. Senate:
If you've saved your payment information with ActBlue Express, your donation will go through immediately:
Here are just a few of the things Mark Kirk was apparently fine with when he endorsed Donald Trump:
- Referring to Mexicans as rapists
- Proposing to ban Muslims from entering the country
- Calling women fat pigs and dogs
- Mocking a reporter’s disability
- Leading the birther movement
It’s no surprise, really. Earlier this week, we emailed you about a
new quiz testing whether voters could tell the difference between Mark
Kirk and Donald Trump’s sexist and racially insensitive remarks.
A typical response: “Kirk sounds even worse than the Donald!”
Regardless of whether he’s still endorsing Donald Trump,
Mark Kirk is supporting and enabling Trump’s shameful and bigoted
agenda. Contribute now to replace Trump sympathizer Mark Kirk with a
senator who will stand up to Donald Trump’s hateful rhetoric:
How much racism and sexism is acceptable to Mark Kirk?
Kirk is finally backing away from his endorsement of Donald Trump,
after Trump’s racist attacks on a federal judge. But Donald Trump made a
whole lot of other racist, sexist and bigoted remarks before these
latest comments, and Mark Kirk was apparently fine with all of that when
he endorsed Trump in March.
We can’t let Kirk hide from his months of support for Trump’s hateful rhetoric.
We just released a new video highlighting a few of the worst
Donald Trump moments that didn’t cost him Mark Kirk’s support.
Contribute now to help us get the word out and hold Mark Kirk
accountable for failing to denounce Donald Trump’s hatred and bigotry
for far too long.
If you've saved your payment information with ActBlue Express, your donation will go through immediately:
When Donald Trump called Mexicans rapists, Mark Kirk was apparently
fine with that. When Trump proposed banning Muslims from entering the
United States, Kirk -- who once said “I’m OK with discrimination against
young Arab males” -- didn’t let it stop his endorsement. When Trump
advocated punishing women who have abortions or attacked Megyn Kelly,
Kirk didn’t object. When Trump mocked a journalist with a physical
disability, that still wasn't offensive enough to cost him Kirk’s
support.
Kirk himself said the latest Trump comments were “too racist”,
implying a little racism or sexism is okay with him. Apparently for
Kirk, racism, sexism and bigotry cross the line only when there’s a
political cost. That’s not leadership.
Let’s make sure Illinois voters know the truth about Kirk’s
shameful support for Donald Trump. Contribute now to spread the word:
The recently-signed Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) was negotiated
behind closed doors with hundreds of corporate advisors. It would make
it easier to offshore good jobs, push down our wages, and undermine
essential climate policies, affordable medicines, safe food, human
rights & an open Internet.
It should not be approved, and certainly not during a “lame
duck” session of Congress after the November election—when members are
the least politically accountable to constituents.
Hillary Clinton and Bernie Sanders have both announced opposition to a
lame duck vote on the TPP. But House Democratic Leader Nancy Pelosi has
refused to take a position. Her public position will have enormous
influence on how other House Democrats vote.
Some are saying it could be Massachusetts Sen. Elizabeth Warren, Labor
Secretary Tom Perez, New Jersey Sen. Cory Booker, Ohio Sen. Sherrod
Brown, Hawaii Rep. Tulsi Gabbard or Minnesota Sen. Amy Klobuchar.
Submit a public comment to the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau: The proposed payday lending rule is a major step forward but
should be strengthened to better protect American consumers from
predatory lenders. The CFPB should apply ability-to-repay requirements
to every loan, limit total indebtedness, increase protections against
loan flipping, and broaden the rule to cover any loan that enables
lenders to coerce repayment from borrowers.
From CREDO--how we won the fight on Social Security
Do you remember 2010?
Just six years ago, the movement to expand Social Security was
virtually invisible. President Obama had empowered a fast-track
commission that was dead set on cutting Social Security and Medicare.
The Washington consensus was that Social Security benefit cuts were
inevitable – the only question was how big the cuts would be.
Back then it was pretty lonely in D.C. to be standing against the
Democratic president’s commision. We had to push back not only against a
popular Democratic president, but against the mainstream Democratic
establishment that wanted to give him leeway to cut other deals. In 2010, it was like pulling teeth to get Democrats to pledge “no cuts” to Social Security, Medicare or Medicaid.
But CREDO Action and Social Security Works weren’t interested in being popular in D.C., we were interested in what was right. And so from day one we opposed any and all efforts to cut benefits.
Whether we faced fast-track commissions like Bowles-Simpson, debt
ceiling hostage crises, or supercommittees, we collectively raised our
voices and stopped these attempts to dismantle our earned benefits. The
plain fact of America’s retirement security crisis was powerful enough
that the same arguments against cuts were also arguments FOR expanding
benefits. We didn’t rest in victory – we kept fighting. And six years later, the president announced that he supports increased benefits to address the retirement security crisis. We did that together. Our voices changed the conversation.
Working together, Social Security Works, CREDO Action and
other key partners in the progressive movement determined that the best
defense would be a good offense – and that our Social Security system
needed to be expanded.
Along the way, we changed the entire debate. Social Security expansion became the official position of the Democratic Party.
President Obama, both remaining Democratic presidential candidates, and
over 90 percent of Senate Democrats are now on record supporting
expansion. And Republicans who want to cut our earned benefits are scared and desperate.
So when you saw President Obama say Social Security should be
expanded, yes, it was a victory for CREDO, Social Security Works, and
leaders like Sens. Bernie Sanders, Elizabeth Warren, Tom Harkin, Sherrod
Brown, Reps. Keith Ellison, Raul Grijalva, and other progressive
champions in Congress. But that victory would never have been in reach without you and everything you’ve done with us since 2010.
The emails, the calls to Congress, the meetings in district offices,
the protests at town hall meetings. You made President Obama change over
the course of these last six years. Now it’s up to us to make the next
president and the next Congress do it.
We know the American people are on our side. In fact, polling shows
that 79 percent of likely voters – Democrats, Republicans and
Independents – support expanding Social Security benefits and paying for
it by asking the wealthy to pay their fair share. And when we
do, we’ll be able to increase benefits for millions of Americans and
extend the lifespan of the Social Security trust fund.
Tell Congress: “Pass the Hold Accountable and Lend Transparency (HALT) Campus
Sexual Violence Act to strengthen efforts to combat the epidemic of
sexual violence on college campuses.”
Tea
Party Republican Cresent Hardy calls Cliven Bundy his “good friend” and
wants to sell our cherished lands to the oil companies who fund his
campaign.
We have the opportunity to defeat Hardy, but first we must nominate the strongest Democrat to defeat Hardy in November.
President
Clinton, Sen. Harry Reid, and over a dozen labor unions agree that
Democrat Ruben Kihuen is our best shot at defeat Hardy. The Primary to
nominate Ruben is on Tuesday.
But wait, there's more on Cresent Hardy...he sure has been, er, popular today!
His name is Tea Party Hardy - and he is the most vulnerable Republican in Congress.
Not only is Hardy falling far behind in fundraising, but he continues to trump Trump by bullying the disabled, calling those with disabilities "a drain on society."
Hardy's
floundering campaign is calling in favors from the Walmart heirs, his
Tea Party allies like outlaw rancher Cliven Bundy and big Super PAC
lobbyists from DC.
It
takes 100 grassroots donors giving $5 each to match just one of the
checks Hardy's campaign has cashed from the Koch Brothers and the
Waltons. Will you be the fist to pitch in today?
From Avaaz--good news on Monsanto...time for some well-deserved optimism
Dear Avaazers,
18 months ago, Monsanto's vast chemical-agricultural empire was rock solid.
Now, after over 2 million of us ran 20 campaigns, with millions of
signatures, messages, phone calls, stunts, advocacy meetings and media
stories... the future of the 'Monsanto model' is actually in question!!
The European Union just refused to grant Monsanto a new license for its
flagship product - the pesticide glyphosate. This is massive -
glyphosate accounts for up to a third of all Monsanto's revenue!
"Looking to where we were in the beginning of this year and
where we are now, Avaaz is indisputably the driving force of the fight
for glyphosate discontinuance." Pavel Poc, Vice-Chair of the EU Parliament's Environment Committee, and key leader of the glyphosate fight
This is far from over. But it's an utter game-changer for countries like
Germany, France and Italy to challenge the basis of Monsanto's entire
business model.
Avaaz petition delivered to European Parliament
We haven't been knee-jerk anti-pesticide. Our campaign calls for a
suspension until independent science determines the safety of
glyphosate. We'll keep fighting, but if the EU allows 18 months for a
new scientific process to weigh in, and we can ensure that process is
truly independent, we could win this!!
We can also use the next 18 months to focus scrutiny on the global
environmental impact of the Monsanto model, which is turning the surface
of our planet into strange, toxic "biodeserts" where only one
genetically modified Monsanto crop can grow.
Like with climate change and the Paris agreement, Avaaz has mobilised
people on this issue at an unprecedented scale - we've taken the fight
against Monsanto to a whole new level, and now it's up to all of us,
over the next 18 months, to win it.
First big oil, now Monsanto. We are taking on the dragons of our world.
But if we stick together, and choose to believe and act, we can do
anything.
With hope and determination,
Ricken, Alice, Bert, Pascal and the whole Avaaz team
PS - For more detail on all the tactics, meetings, and story of Avaaz's glyphosate campaigning in the last year, here's a summary.
Avaaz.org is a 44-million-person global campaign network that
works to ensure that the views and values of the world's people shape
global decision-making. ("Avaaz" means "voice" or "song" in many
languages.) Avaaz members live in every nation of the world; our team is
spread across 18 countries on 6 continents and operates in 17
languages. Learn about some of Avaaz's biggest campaigns here, or follow us on Facebook or Twitter.
Petition to Congress: "The Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) is a disaster for our
environment. It would increase greenhouse gas emissions, undermine our
transition to clean energy and give foreign corporations power to oppose
our efforts to protect our air, water and climate. You must reject the
TPP."
Editor's note: the minimum sentence for rape in California is two years. The actual sentence of six months, with three of those months suspended, is ludicrously lenient. Can you imagine what the sentence would have been if Brock Turner had been Black? -- Dot Calm's shadow
Trending petition
Last
week Judge Aaron Persky sentenced Stanford student Brock Turner to six
months in jail after he was convicted of three felonies in the rape of a
young woman. Thousands of people think his sentence was far too lenient
and are calling for the judge’s removal.
Petitioning California
State House, California State Senate, Ted Gaines, Cristina Garcia,
Kristin Olsen, Roger Hernandez, Rich Gordon, Jerry Hill, Mark Leno,
Marty Block, Fran Pavley, Zoe Lofgren, Barbara Boxe...
We
the people would like to petition that Judge Aaron Persky be removed
from his Judicial position for the lenient sentence he allowed in the
Brock Turner rape case. Despite a unanimous guilty verdict, three felony
convictions, the objections of 250 Stanford students, Jeff Rosen the
district attorney for Santa Clara, as well as the deputy district
attorney who likened Turner to " a predator searching for prey" Judge
Persky allowed the lenient sentence suggested by the probation
department. Turner has shown no remorse and plans to attempt to overturn
his conviction. Judge Persky failed to see that the fact that Brock
Turner is a white male star athlete at a prestigious university does not
entitle him to leniency. He also failed to send the message that sexual
assault is against the law regardless of social class, race, gender or
other factors. Please help rectify this travesty to justice.
*****Please also sign the White House Petition. If it reaches its goal of 100K signatures it must be addressed by the current administration within 60 days.https://wh.gov/isMlY******
Please also go fill out the form in the link below: http://cjp.ca.gov/res/docs/appendix/complaintform%20fillable.pdf
The information you will need is as follows: Name of Judge: Aaron
Persky Court: Supreme Court County: Santa Clara Name and case number:
State of California vs. Brock Allen Turner Case #B1577162 Please
specify: Appearance of bias toward a particular class: Pensky sentenced
fellow alumni and athlete Of Stanford university to an unusually lenient
sentence of 6 months for a unanimously guilty verdict on three counts
of sexual assault. Despite Mr Turner showing no remorse and despite
being caught in the act. Inappropriate comments on the bench: "a prison
sentence would have a severe impact on him(Brock Turner)" in relation to
why this convicted rapist would serve such a short sentence. Present
parties include Brock Turner/ Aaron Persky/ Jeff Rosen/ Mike Armstrong/
Emily Doe/ others. If you would like to contact the judge, Aaron
Persky's courtroom clerk # is 650-462-3880 IMPORTANT
And here's another petition on the Stanford rape --this time, aimed at Stanford--from Change.org. My view? Women deserve better.
Trending petition
A
freshman who was convicted of assaulting a woman during a Stanford frat
party was recently sentenced to 6 months in prison. Students are now
calling the university out for its silence regarding the case, and
asking that it commit more resources to preventing sexual assault and
supporting survivors.
On
January 18, 2015, a woman was brutally assaulted on Stanford’s campus
during a Kappa Alpha Fraternity party. Brock Allen Turner, who at the
time was a Stanford freshman, was found thrusting himself into an
unconscious woman on the ground behind a dumpster. Two Stanford graduate
students witnessed the incident and stopped the perpetrator. In March
2016, Turner was found guilty on three felony counts, facing a
punishment of a maximum of 14 years in state prison. On June 2, 2016,
Turner was sentenced to only six months in county jail and three years probation. Now, he is expected to serve only three months with good behavior.
On Friday, the survivor released the letter
that she read to Brock Turner during the sentencing. To describe the
letter as anything less than heroic would be a disservice to her bravery
and to every survivor. However, she still did not receive the justice
she deserved. While her story is unique, the outcome of the sentencing
is one that happens much too often. If anything, the results of this
case set the precedent that even when the legal system finds guilt, it
does not provide the justice that survivors deserve. While this case,
like many others, demonstrates the problems of the legal system and the
prevalence of rape culture, there are still ways in which Stanford
University can step up and support the survivor.
This petition is in support of the survivor in this case. We are asking that Stanford:
1.
Immediately and publicly apologize to the survivor based on the fact
that the attack happened on Stanford’s campus and express support for
her bravery and suffering.
2. Publicly offer accommodations including counseling and other supportive services to the survivor.
3.
Increase the amount of resources allocated for sexual assault
prevention, adopt evidence-based prevention programs, and introduce new
university requirements on sexual assault education that students must
complete during their time at Stanford.
4.
Increase its counseling resources for all survivors on campus and
address the longstanding issues with CAPS so that students who are
suffering from sexual assault have the help that they need.
5.
Administer a national, uniform climate survey like that developed by
the AAU and in use in our peer schools which asks about the incidence of
sexual violence occurring in fraternities.
On Thursday,
California Secretary of State Alex Padilla said at least 2 million
votes cast in California's presidential primary election have yet to be
counted. So far Hillary ... Read More →
President Obama met Thursday
with Democratic presidential candidate Bernie Sanders in the Oval
Office and then endorsed his rival Hillary Clinton in a video posted on
... Read More →
Dave Zirin, sports editor for The Nation
magazine, joins us from Muhammad Ali's hometown, Louisville, Kentucky,
where he will attend Ali's funeral. Zirin recounts Ali's ... Read More →
As
the Democratic platform committee meets in Washington, we speak to
Michelle Chan, spokesperson for Friends of the Earth Action. She is
working on ... Read More →
Thousands
have gathered in Louisville, Kentucky, hometown of Muhammad Ali, to
mourn the death of one of the most iconic figures of the 20th century.
Ali was ... Read More →
As
Bernie Sanders prepares to meet with President Obama, we speak to Green
Party presidential candidate Jill Stein, who has also been reaching out
to the Vermont senator. ... Read More →
Green
Party presidential candidate Jill Stein takes aim at the presumptive
nominees of both major parties, Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton. "Trump
says very scary ... Read More →
New
York Governor Andrew Cuomo has issued the first-ever executive order
forcing state agencies to divest from any organizations aligned with the
Boycott, Divestment and ... Read More →
More
than 60,000 people have signed a petition calling for Stanford
University to apologize publicly to the woman who was raped on campus
last year by a Stanford University ... Read More →
Actor-activist
Danny Glover and Paul Jay discuss how Sanders will balance stopping
Trump with differences of interest and principal with Clinton. READ MORE»
New
research finds no serious long-term consequences from using marijuana,
but it does find a link between pot smoking and poorer gum health. READ MORE»
Civil
liberties advocates are highly skeptical of the idea that otherwise
healthy people just drop dead in police custody for reasons that have
nothing to do with the police. READ MORE»
The speaker canceled a Wednesday press conference... conveniently, as Pelosi pointed out. READ MORE»
********************************************
Movies
Seth Andrews's video sampling the 2016 Reason Rally. Ah, wish I'd been there!
Secular Talk: how not to attack Donald Trump
John Oliver: Trump-related litigation
These next two John Oliver videos on TrumPEW have been clipped from a larger whole that must be somewhere on teh Intert00bs. I'll post that video as soon as I find it. Meanwhile, these two get the idea across. Hum, reminds me of an old classmate who promised his girlfriend a "toyota" if she solved a riddle. She solved it, and he gave her a "toy Yoda."
Bernie goes after the corrupt Clinton foundation. He was too much of a gentleman. He didn't want to attack her--just her policies. Maybe he should have attacked her. Then we wouldn't be faced with such a grim choice.
As I mentioned in the intro, Kyle's advice on how to handle Trump vs Clinton without sticking a gun in your mouth
Whoopsie--Trump paid off Florida AG with campaign money so she'd drop her state's investigation of TrumPEW
I'm just starting to watch Chris Hedges's (yes, it's Hedges's--there is only one of him) speeches. He's been on "Democracy Now!" a number of times, and I always found him interesting.
Cringe-worthy but funny Handyman Corner on fixing dents
Sorry, Loves--no cartoon today. I have a headache and a stomachache, so I need to just go rest right now. See you next week--hopefully fit as a fiddle and ready to blawg! As the Redneck Liberal says (but I really mean it with youse guys 'n' gals): Kisses!!