Isn’t it stunning, women are right back to: She was asking for it! Look how short her skirt was!

Thanx, Pubs! You prix!

Women voters beware!! Don’t vote for any of these Republican freaks! They’re not your friends!

Remember the hard time Kennedy got for being a Catholic? Have you seen the special on the Mormon cult? OMG!

All in The Family! Isn’t that Special!

Did y’all know that one of Mittens sons (they’re spreading like ants!) is invested in the...the...OMG!....the VOTING MACHINES in Ohio?!

What Could Possibly Go Wrong??

Did y’all know that all analysts agree that a candidate can’t win the Presidential Election without winning the state of Ohio?!

Okay..I’ll go with that...

Did y’all know that Romney is willing to win the state by any means necessary.

This doesn’t sound good...In fact, it sounds downright ominous!

Did y’all know that PoliticolNews.com, is reporting Romney’s son, Tagg, has invested in the electronic voting machines being used in Ohio?

The new voting machines are under the brand name HART Intercivic and Tagg Romney is one of the owners of the company.

Oh, phuque! Bummer!

And while we’re here, what kind of a name is Tagg? Is that his middle name? Is his first name Price??
 
Can you picture Mitt’s kids playing with the Palin brats? “Throw it here, Tagg!” “It’s your turn, Tripp”...STOP! My ears are bleeding!

**************************************
“Peace cannot be kept by force; it can only be
achieved by understanding.”

                                                --Albert Einstein
**************************************

What is the difference between "Universal Coverage" and the "Single-Payer System"?

"Universal Coverage" and the "Single-Payer System" are two separate yet closely related concepts.

"Universal coverage" refers to a health care system where every individual has health coverage.

According to the U.S. Census Bureau, there were 46.6 million Americans without health insurance coverage in 2005.

In contrast, there are no uninsured Canadian citizens--their government-run system provides universal coverage.

A "single-payer system" is one in which there is one party--usually the government--responsible for paying health care claims.

This contrasts with the current U.S. health care system, where thousands of private insurance companies are responsible for paying some claims, while federal and state governments are responsible for others.

In most cases, "universal coverage" and "single-payer system" go hand-in-hand, because a country's federal government is the most likely candidate to administer and pay for a health care system covering millions of people.

It is hard to imagine a private entity having the resources--or even the inclination--to establish a nationwide health care coverage system.

However, it is possible to have universal coverage without having a single-payer system. For example, some experts have suggested that we incrementally reform the U.S. health care system to provide a government-funded safety net for the sick and poor, while requiring those more fortunate to purchase their own policies.

Various political interests will likely prevent this from ever happening, but it is possible to construct such a system, which would provide universal coverage with multiple payers.

While it is theoretically possible to have a single-payer system without having universal coverage, it is extremely unlikely to ever occur because the single-payer would undoubtedly be the federal government.

If our government adopts such a system, it would not be politically viable for them to exclude any citizen from coverage.