Tuesday, December 16, 2014

So, we finally begin to learn how/when Cheney (that's pronounced phuck!) sold this country out!  

The Halliburton Loophole

Content taken from Burning Question: What Would Life Be Like Without the Halliburton Loophole:


“The loop­hole refers to the Energy Pol­icy Act of 2005, which exempts the hydraulic frac­tur­ing process, also known as frack­ing, from fed­eral over­sight under the Safe Drink­ing Water Act of 1974.

Then Vice Pres­i­dent Dick Cheney did have a hand in get­ting the exemp­tion put into the Energy Pol­icy Act.

Gawd bless uncle dickie...always watching out for our best interests! Waddaguy!

He chaired Pres­i­dent Bush’s Energy Pol­icy Task Force, which rec­om­mended frack­ing be excluded.

Oh yeah...Gotta exclude fracking...

And Cheney is a for­mer Hal­libur­ton exec­u­tive.

Oh? I was unaware of that...I thought he was a weaver. 

Hal­libur­ton, by the way, began frack­ing in the 1940’s to extract for oil. 

But the use of frack­ing, com­bined with hor­i­zon­tal drilling, has only recently been used to mine shale gas.

The loop­hole does have an excep­tion.  

If drilling com­pa­nies use diesel fuel to frack a well, they do have to get a fed­eral permit.


Also amended in the 2005 Energy Pol­icy Act was the Clean Water Act

Con­gress enacted the CWA back in 1972 as a way to reg­u­late dis­charges into the country’s rivers and streams. 

The CWA was amended in 1987 to include storm water run-off. 

But oil and gas pro­duc­tion are exempted from those reg­u­la­tions. 

And in the 2005 Energy Pol­icy Act, those exemp­tions included oil and gas con­struc­tion. 

Envi­ron­men­tal­ists worry about run-off from well pads, pipelines and con­struc­tion sites.


With­out fed­eral over­sight, it’s up to the states to reg­u­late gas drilling.”


“And it’s not just the Clean Water Act, and the Safe Drink­ing Water Act that exempt the oil and gas indus­try. 

The Clean Air Act, passed by Con­gress in 1970, exempts oil and gas wells from aggre­ga­tion. 

That means, each well site is con­sid­ered an indi­vid­ual source of pol­lu­tants, and does not take into account all of the well sites in a spe­cific area.


When it comes to the han­dling of waste water, or frack water, that too is exempt from a fed­eral statute called the Resource Con­ser­va­tion and Recov­ery Act. 

The RCRA tracks indus­trial wastes from “cra­dle to grave.” 

But when it comes to the oil and gas indus­try, as long as the waste water is on the drill site, or being trans­ported, it is not con­sid­ered haz­ardous. 

This also applies to drilling mud. 

That’s why trucks car­ry­ing waste water, which con­tains high lev­els of salts, toxic chem­i­cals, as well as radioac­tive mate­r­ial, may be labeled “resid­ual waste.”


The National Envi­ron­men­tal Pol­icy Act, or NEPA, requires fed­eral agen­cies to do envi­ron­men­tal impact state­ments if major indus­trial projects would impact the envi­ron­ment. 

But the Energy Pol­icy Act of 2005 rel­e­gated oil and gas oper­a­tions to a less strin­gent process.


Finally, the Toxic Release Inven­tory requires indus­tries to report toxic chem­i­cals to the EPA. 

But the oil and gas indus­try are exempt from this reporting.”

RESOURCES:
Read the Complete Energy Policy Act of 2005
State of the Law:
 Federal, State and Local Regulation of Hydrofracturing, 
(Kathleen Dachille, JD)

I'm sorry folks, I've lost my sense of humor tonite...this bastard is just so evil!

EVIL + STUPID = Ch Ch Ch Cheney and Dumbo