Friday, May 24, 2013

WASHINGTON--Oklahoma Sen. Jim Inhofe (R) said on Tuesday that federal aid to tornado-ravaged parts of his home state will be "totally different" from that of the Hurricane Sandy aid bill he voted against late last year. 

Why? Because it’s your state that needs Federal aid this time!

Since the wealth of the United States has shifted from the entire middle class to a few individuals, will Mitt Romney use some of his ginormous wealth to pay for the rebuilding of Moore, Oklahoma?

Can you say: in your dreams, sucker! How the phuque do you think I got so bloody rich?

Speaking on MSNBC, the lawmaker said that in the case of Hurricane Sandy, "everybody was getting in and exploiting the tragedy that took place." However,” he said, "that won't happen in Oklahoma."

You're damned tootin!

Inhofe said the Sandy Relief bill "was supposed to be in New Jersey," but "they were getting things … in the Virgin Islands, fixing roads there, and putting roofs on houses in Washington, D.C."

Both Inhofe and Coburn (the other douche bag from Oklahoma) voted to slash aid to victims of Hurricane Sandy, with Inhofe saying he considered the full proposed aid amount to be a "slush fund."

Yeah! Those damned Okies...can you just hear them?...Oh, good! A tornado...time to get our “wish list” filled.

While Northeastern states like New Jersey and New York suffered some of the worst damage from Hurricane Sandy, the storm affected 24 U.S. states in total during October of 2012.

Sandy carved a destructive path from the Caribbean Sea to the Great Lakes, where it produced 25-foot waves in Lake Huron.

Coburn would demand that tornado relief funds for Oklahoma be offset by cuts elsewhere in the federal budget, a position consistent with what he has said in the past, even when the aid was for his home state.

Offset problem made easy: Cut Coburn’s salary!